Thank you for this! I've been waiting for a long while for the new drop and I'm really glad to hear these news.

<br>

<br>greetings from Germany,

<br>SecurityException

Any chance of seeing a TRIE, b-tree or linked list collections?

Plz plz plz PLEASE let Set&lt;T&gt; and OrderedSet&lt;T&gt; implement ISet&lt;T&gt;. Sometimes you need Collections, which take equal Elements only once, for example, you may have a method like this:

<br>

<br>// Adds many items to the given Collection, but they shall only

<br>// be contained once. However, it would be the most efficient

<br>// way here to use a Set and just call set.Add(...) for the items

<br>// to be added instead of searching for them if they are already

<br>// in the given collection.

<br>public void method(ISet&lt;T&gt; set)

<br>{

<br>    ...

<br>}

<br>

<br>This method does not mind, if a OrderedSet or a Set is given here. It just wants to use some kind of Set, but I don't know any way to achieve this.

<br>

<br>greetings,

<br>SecurityException

@Paul Welter:

<br>

<br>try System.Collections.Generic.LinkedList&lt;T&gt;

I don't see the need for an ISet&lt;T&gt; here. ICollection&lt;T&gt; has an Add method that will work just fine in this case.

<br>

<br>ICollection is more general than a hypothetical ISet, but not every semantic difference should be expressed as a separate type in the type system.

http://www.igsky.com

http://www.maple-story-mesos.com

http://www.msmesos.eu

http://www.maple-story.org

http://www.igsky.com

http://www.lotrogold.us

http://www.lotro-gold.eu